Which framework is the best among the trio?
The list is headed by two frameworks that got the most shares of respondents, according to Statista. NodeJS, engraved in Chrome’s engine, and AngularJS, powered by Google, got about 50% and 37%, respectively. The numbers provoked a hot discussion among developers and software development analytics comparing AngularJS vs NodeJS. The third framework in the list of the top employed executive tools is ReactJS, which got about 28% of the share. However, it is not wise to judge these three frameworks from the percentage of use angle of view. Though all three use the same program language, they have been created to accomplish different tasks. That is, NodeJS is a back-end framework, whereas two others are responsible for viewing web pages. Each of them has its own advantages in its domain of applicability. Therefore, it will be more sensible to describe them separately, listing their pros and cons in terms of purpose and effectiveness.
When Google launched this execution tool, its purpose was (as its naming suggests) to assist angular developers. They often have to deal with various issues that arise while creating a single-page app. The framework contributes to expanding HTML vocabulary for a web app. Thanks to its flexibility, the tool can successfully interact with other existing libraries. If an app interface uses this declarative language, it is easy for other web frameworks to comprehend and accept it. The more attributes you have in your language, the more recognizable it becomes to others. When we discuss AngularJS vs NodeJS vs ReactJS angle, we should remember that an attribute helps to identify which controller to implement for each element in the framework. Which in turn simplifies the development. A developer only needs to outline the desired outcome. Moreover, the support community is large enough to find a needed solution in time. There are many libraries available. So whenever you face a difficulty, you can easily find the right piece of advice.
Pros of using AngularJS
- The injection subsystem, which is supplied with the inbuilt dependency
- Uncomplicated routing
- The angular data supported by large lots of app developers
- The opportunity to create adapted Document Object Model effortlessly
- The flexible appliance of filters and commands
- Remarkable user interface
- Can be extended to HTML structure, allowing to the creation of reusable constituents by directives
- Provides control over moving between different views
- Comprehensive libraries along with vigorous template constructing solutions
- Maintains Unit Testing as well as Integration Testing
As it happens, the framework is tightly connected to the Dependency Injection. That is why all controllers are governed by DI. That enables a developer to inject artificial data into a controller and measure the outcome performance. This feature broadens the ways of web app testing. Now an individual trial page is written to request one of the components. The interaction between them shows whether it works or not. Such an opportunity helps a developer to test an app and eliminate errors in programming. In the AngularJS vs NodeJS contest, the former loses some points due to its downsides.
- Possible presentation issues with DOM components
- Debugging issue with the application scope
- Limited routing opportunity
- Can be slow on pages containing engraved interactive elements
- Challenging third-party assimilation
Unlike the two other frameworks in this article, which are in charge of viewing web pages, this toolkit is a back-end framework. That means that it is not the client-side framework, quite the opposite. It is believed to be a server itself, as it is engraved into the Chrome V8 JS engine. The purpose behind its creation was to build network applications with scalability and rapidity. Therefore, it is a great tool if you wish to shorten the development of a compound application. Whereas the former is Google’s initiative, the latter is backed up by another giant in the app development industry – Facebook. It signifies its reliability and effectiveness. The large community also provides lots of libraries available whenever a novice experiences difficulty with app development. It is extraordinary for building APIs. Having compared AngularJS vs NodeJS vs ReactJS, we can see that the second one ensures better performance by providing multifaceted features. It is easy enough to use, so a developer does not need profound skills. Which in turn reduces the cost and shortens development time.
Pros of using NodeJS
- Free, open-source platform due to the MIT license.
- Allows to scale-up apps in both vertical and horizontal manners
- Supports the caching of particular modules
- Real-time app development
- Supported by Windows, Linux, and MAC
- Assign the same coding to both ends (client and server)
- Unhinged streaming of enormous files
- Availability of NPMs
- Libraries are not extensive for every issue that occurred
- Frequent changes are challenging because the new API might result in backward-incompatible alterations
- Asynchronous approach instead of linear blocking I/O encoding
- Inapplicable to extensive and complex projects as it lacks in maintaining multi-threaded coding
- Unsuitable for one CPU because it is unable to advantage of executing multiple tasks
- Designed for web servers needs
You may use it as a proxy, which enhances managing several simultaneous connections, employing a non-blocking approach. It might come in handy while accumulating data from numerous sources. It might help alternate various services that differ in the response time. Another aspect that should not be neglected in terms of AngularJS vs NodeJS comparison is the data streaming facility. Although HTTP request and response seem to be separate procedures, they are streams that are great for creating remarkable features. You might find it useful while building your web app.
Pros of using ReactJS
- Powerful JSX that allows HTML quoting and provides elements of an extensive system utilizing the HTML tag structure
- Local libraries that have a new kind of architecture for local apps like IOS, Android, and UPD
- Single-way data flow
- Fast Virtual DOM gives a cope to the program for coding
- Re-usage of the code components
- Code rendering can enhance the webpage SEO
- Reliable and fast at debugging
- UI components might be used without re-writing to a current app’s code
- Support for both user and server-side
- Offers tutorials for developers
- Fast DOM refreshes only a fragment of a page compared to conventional total refresh model
- Easy to create UI Test Cases
- It can display constituents in large amounts promptly and efficiently
- Specialized Chrome extension simplifies debugging
- JSX can be a severe disadvantage due to its complexity and has an abrupt learning curve
- Incomplete documentation creates difficulties for novice developers
- Any data changes necessitate manual processing
Obviously all three frameworks offer ready-to-use components that can significantly reduce development time. Using these tools you can enrich your apps and subsequently customize them.
How to make the right choice?
This trio represents the most used frameworks that provide enhanced performance and are recognized for their efficiency. To make the right decision is not difficult, you need to make up your mind on what you want to accomplish. Keep in mind that the former is a framework, while the second one is JS runtime, which allows building beautiful and productive network apps. The third one in the trio is a library that makes handling large databases easier.
Looking for a reliable partner? NIX Solutions has a team of highly qualified developers that deliver excellent results to various clients for the last 25 years.